Limited time20% off all gift vouchersSave 20% on any amount — ends 6 September.Buy now
Remedial massage reference

The evidence

Does reflexology work, and can you claim it?

Two separate questions with two clear answers. The evidence does not support the medical claims, and no Australian fund may lawfully rebate a reflexology session.

Reviewed by our lead remedial massage therapist, a member of the Australian Natural Therapists Association.

Facts on this page were last checked against their sources on 19 August 2026.

We offer reflexology at this studio. That is exactly why this page exists in the form it does, because the two honest answers about it both point away from a sale.

The short version

  • The best available evidence does not demonstrate that reflexology is an effective treatment for any medical condition.1
  • A review update reached the same conclusion. Of the higher-quality trials, nine were negative and five positive.2
  • No Australian health fund may lawfully pay a rebate on it. This is Commonwealth law, not fund policy.3
  • It is still a genuinely pleasant hour, and that is a legitimate reason to book one. It is just not a medical one.

What the evidence says

The clearest assessment was published in the Medical Journal of Australia in 2009. It searched six databases from inception, found 18 randomised controlled trials covering conditions from asthma to dementia to premenstrual syndrome, and rated their methodological quality.

Five trials yielded positive results. The quality was often poor and sample sizes were generally low, and most of the higher-quality trials did not generate positive findings. The conclusion: the best evidence available to date does not demonstrate convincingly that reflexology is an effective treatment for any medical condition.1

An update two years later covered 23 trials and reached the same place. Nine high-quality trials generated negative findings, five generated positive ones, and the authors again concluded that the best clinical evidence does not demonstrate convincingly that reflexology is effective for any medical condition.2

The most recent large review, covering 26 studies and 2,465 cancer patients, is more generous but still cannot get there. The results were too heterogeneous and the methods too limited for a clear statement on effectiveness. Reflexology did beat passive control groups for pain, quality of life and fatigue, but studies with comparable active control groups are missing, which is the comparison that would tell you whether reflexology specifically is doing anything beyond a pleasant hour of attention.4

That pattern, an effect against doing nothing but not against an active alternative, runs through the whole massage literature. It is covered on the how massage works page.

The map

The theory behind reflexology is that specific points on the feet correspond to specific organs and body systems, and that pressure on a point affects the organ. There is no anatomical structure connecting them and no proposed mechanism that has been demonstrated. Treat the chart as a tradition rather than a map of the body.

Why you cannot claim it

This one is not a judgement call, and it is worth being precise about because plenty of clinics get it wrong.

Reflexology is one of the natural therapies excluded from private health insurance by the Commonwealth. It was excluded in April 2019 and, unlike the seven therapies re-included from 1 July 2025, it remains excluded.5 The Department's circular states that where a session is advertised or promoted as reflexology, or where the only service provided is reflexology, health insurance benefits cannot lawfully be paid.3

So the answer does not depend on your level of extras cover, your fund, your therapist's qualifications or whether the clinic has a HICAPS terminal. No fund may pay. Any clinic that rebates a reflexology session is billing it as something else.

The full picture on what is and is not claimable is on the health funds page.

So why do we still offer it

Because people enjoy it, and enjoying an hour of careful attention to your feet is a perfectly good reason to book something.

What we will not do is sell it as treatment. It is not marketed here as balancing organs, clearing blockages or addressing any condition, it is not receipted as anything claimable, and if you want an hour that might help a specific musculoskeletal complaint, remedial massage has a better evidence base and is claimable.

That is a smaller claim than the one the industry makes for reflexology. It is the one we can stand behind.

Frequently asked questions

Does reflexology actually work?

The best available evidence does not demonstrate that it is an effective treatment for any medical condition. Two systematic reviews of randomised trials reached that conclusion, and in both, most of the higher-quality trials were negative.

Can I claim reflexology on my health fund?

No. Reflexology is excluded from private health insurance by the Commonwealth, and the Department's circular states that benefits cannot lawfully be paid where a session is advertised as reflexology or where reflexology is the only service provided. It does not depend on your fund or your level of cover.

Is reflexology the same as a foot massage?

No. A foot massage is soft tissue work on the foot. Reflexology applies pressure to specific points based on a chart mapping the foot to organs and body systems, and it is that mapping which has no demonstrated anatomical basis.

Is it safe?

For most people, yes. It is gentle pressure on the feet. Tell your therapist about any circulation problems, diabetes-related foot changes, recent injury or skin conditions before a session.

Should I book reflexology or remedial massage?

If you want an hour that is pleasant and relaxing, either works. If you want work directed at a specific musculoskeletal complaint, or you want to claim on your extras cover, remedial massage is the one with both the better evidence base and the rebate.

Sources

Every claim on this page traces to one of these. They are all public, and they all open.

  1. 1.Ernst E. Is reflexology an effective intervention? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Medical Journal of Australia. 2009. PMID 19740047. View source
  2. 2.Ernst E, Posadzki P, Lee MS. Reflexology: an update of a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Maturitas. 2011. PMID 21111551. View source
  3. 3.PHI 98/25: Eligibility of services for private health insurance general treatment benefits where they include elements of excluded natural therapies. Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing. 2025. Checked 18 August 2026. View source
  4. 4.Klaus M, et al. Reflexology in oncological treatment: a systematic review. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 2024. PMID 38212747. View source
  5. 5.Natural Therapies Review. Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing. 2026. Checked 18 August 2026. View source

The full library is on our sources page.

This page is general information, not advice about your own situation. If you would like to talk through what suits you, we are happy to help.